Report finds teen substance abuse is top public health problem in US

">
Report finds teen substance abuse is top public health problem in US

Thursday, June 30, 2011

A report issued Wednesday by the Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University finds the top public health problem in the United States is teen drug abuse, including the use of alcohol, tobacco, prescription drugs, marijuana and other controlled substances.

According to the study’s authors, “The study looks at how American culture increases the risk that teens will use addictive substances and how the messages sent by adults, and glamorized by the tobacco and alcohol industries and the media, normalize substance use and undermine the health and futures of our teens.”

Addiction is a disease that in most cases begins in adolescence … We rightfully worry about other teen health problems like obesity, depression or bullying, but we turn a blind eye to a more common and deadly epidemic that we can in fact prevent.

CASA found that 90% of adults who have addictive disorders started using substances before the age of 18. In comparison, only 4% of Americans who abuse as adults started using these drugs when 21 or older.

Further, the consumption of these substances by American teens is rising. Currently almost half of American high school students smoke, drink alcohol or use other drugs, according to the study, and 1 in 5 meet the medical criteria for addiction. Seventy-five percent of all high school students have used addictive substances including tobacco, alcohol, marijuana or cocaine at some point. Over 65% have used more than one.

The researchers found social factors related to the risk of American teens use of addictive substances included parental, community and school acceptance of these substances and the positive media portrayals of drug use as harmless, fun and attractive. Advertising of drugs, alcohol and cigarettes also contributes to the positive image of drug use.

The researchers used online surveys filled out by 1,000 high school students, 1,000 parents of high school students, 500 educators, as well as information from five focus groups and reviews of 2,000 scientific articles and reports, according to US News.

“Addiction is a disease that in most cases begins in adolescence, so preventing or delaying teens from using alcohol, tobacco or other drugs for as long as possible is crucial to their health and safety,” said Susan Foster, CASA’s vice president in a news release. “We rightfully worry about other teen health problems like obesity, depression or bullying, but we turn a blind eye to a more common and deadly epidemic that we can in fact prevent.”

The study’s authors pointed out that the teenage brain is not fully developed and the use of drugs during the teenage years hampers further development of the brain, impairs judgment and increases the risk of addiction as an adult. Heavy substance abuse harms the developing brain far more than the already developed adult brain. They concluded their data shows that adolescence is the critical age period for the onset of substance abuse and its repercussions.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Report_finds_teen_substance_abuse_is_top_public_health_problem_in_US&oldid=2611793”
">Digg
  • Report finds teen substance abuse is top public health problem in US
  • ">Del.icio.us
  • Report finds teen substance abuse is top public health problem in US
  • ">StumbleUpon
  • Report finds teen substance abuse is top public health problem in US
  • ">Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Plane crash in California kills three

    ">
    Plane crash in California kills three

    Thursday, February 18, 2010

    A Cessna 310 plane hit an electrical pylon in Northern California shortly after taking off Wednesday. All three of the plane’s passengers were killed. The plane’s wing struck a house which caught fire, along with parked cars. No injuries on the ground were reported.

    The crash occurred at 7:55 am local time (15:55 UTC). The Federal Aviation Administration said that the plane was originating from Palo Alto Airport and was en route to Hawthorne Municipal Airport in Hawthorne, California.

    The persons killed were employees of Tesla Motors, later identified as Doug Bourn, Andrew Ingram, and Brian Finn, all involved with electronics at the company. Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, released a statement saying, in part, “Tesla is a small, tightly-knit company, and this is a tragic day for us.”

    The plane was registered to Air Unique Incorporated, in Santa Clara, California, which is owned by another Tesla employee Doug Bourn.

    Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Plane_crash_in_California_kills_three&oldid=3169001”
    ">Digg
  • Plane crash in California kills three
  • ">Del.icio.us
  • Plane crash in California kills three
  • ">StumbleUpon
  • Plane crash in California kills three">Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Read User's Comments(0)

    Final report blames London passenger jet crash on ice

    ">
    Final report blames London passenger jet crash on ice
    Posted in Uncategorized | August 6th, 2020

    Wednesday, February 10, 2010

    The United Kingdom’s Air Accidents Investigation Board (AAIB) yesterday blamed a release of ice in the fuel system of a British Airways passenger jet as the cause of a crash two years ago at London’s Heathrow Airport. Flight 38 from China was attempting to land when both engines lost almost all power – a condition called “rollback”.

    The exact phenomenon had never been previously identified, but it not only affected the British Airways jet two years ago but also a Delta Airlines jet above the United States later the same year. Both were Boeing 777 aircraft. That incident prompted the AAIB to collaborate with the US National Transportation Safety Board.

    BA 38 was approximately 43 seconds from touchdown when it experienced a dual engine rollback that was beyond the control of the flight crew. Captain Peter Burkill and co-pilot John Coward were later hailed as heroes for performing a successful crash landing 330 metres from the runway. The plane avoided nearby buildings and a road, leaving the landing gear deployed to act as shock absorbers.

    The jet slid 372 metres after the crash, but all 136 passengers evacuated alive. 36 passengers and twelve crewmembers were injured, mostly suffering whiplash and one incurring a broken leg. The report concluded there was no time to alert the cabin crew or passengers to the situation developing in the cockpit.

    The engine rollback was caused by ice forming in the fuel system; the ice came from water molecules existing as impurities in the fuel, and lined the fuel system. When extra fuel was pumped through to supply the engines for landing manoeuvres, the ice was dislodged.

    It is believed to have then settled on a component called the fuel-oil heat exchanger, a dual-purpose component that runs oil pipes through the fuel system. The idea is to cool down hot oil and keep fuel warm to prevent freezing. As the result of previous safety recommendations from both the UK and US investigators Boeing and engine company Rolls-Royce have worked to redesign the part.

    Every component of the aircraft complied with all relevant airworthiness standards, and the fuel also complied with the standards applying to it. Although ice problems have been known since the 1950s, sudden release problems were unheard of before the crash. The testing conducted as part of the investigation is thought to be unique and the aircraft experienced unusually low temperatures during the flight.

    A total of eighteen safety recommendations have been issued, of which nine came from an interim report and nine are new. Some of these apply to aircraft “crashworthiness” – the ability to withstand impact forces.

    Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Final_report_blames_London_passenger_jet_crash_on_ice&oldid=4577484”
    ">Digg
  • Final report blames London passenger jet crash on ice">Del.icio.us
  • Final report blames London passenger jet crash on ice">StumbleUpon
  • Final report blames London passenger jet crash on ice">Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Read User's Comments(0)

    CEO of GM outlines plan for “New GM” after auto company declared bankruptcy

    ">
    CEO of GM outlines plan for “New GM” after auto company declared bankruptcy
    Posted in Uncategorized | August 6th, 2020

    Thursday, June 4, 2009

    In a New York press conference at 16:15 UTC, June 1st, Fritz Henderson, the Chief Executive Officer of General Motors, which filed for bankruptcy and Chapter 11 protection from its creditors earlier today, outlined a plan for what he called a “New GM”.

    Speaking to the press under safe harbor provisions of U.S. law, Henderson described the events of today as a “defining moment” in the history of General Motors. Speaking to the public he said that “The GM that let you down is history,” and described a “New GM” that he expected to result from the bankruptcy process.

    Henderson stated that he envisioned the bankruptcy process would take between 60 and 90 days. He stressed several times his view that the process would be one that is executed quickly, saying that not just a sense of urgency but “pure unadulterated speed” was his expectation of the process. He emphasized that “GM remains open for business” during the bankruptcy period, continuing to sell and to support its products, and that day one motions had been filed in the bankruptcy court in order to allow this.

    Regarding the bankruptcy process he said, “We will do it right. And we will do it once.”

    He stated that the plan for General Motors had the support of the United Auto Workers union, the Canadian Auto Workers union, the GM VEBA, and a majority of the unsecured bondholders of GM. He also mentioned that GM had already received €1.5 million in bridge financing from the German government.

    In response to questions about the possibility of the United States federal government, a majority shareholder in the restructured company, dictating future product development and strategy, such as the sale of more fuel-efficient and green vehicles; he first observed that the federal government had already stated to him that it had “no real interest in running our business” and that he expected that still to be his job. Of the specific hypothetical scenario where the management of GM wants to make one type of car, because it thinks that it is the right thing for the business, and the U.S. government wants to make another type of car, he stated that “I don’t think it’s going to happen.” Expanding on that point he stated that he expected the “New GM” to focus upon “highly fuel-efficient and green technology”, and that operating both in accordance with U.S. environmental laws and in response to customer demand would naturally result in the New GM producing the types of vehicles that the U.S. government would encourage.

    The “New GM” he also expected to focus on “four core brands”, and will size its dealership to match that. He stated that GM would offer a “deferred termination” package to dealers, to allow them to cease dealing in GM vehicles in a managed and gradual way.

    He stated that the bankruptcy filings did not cover General Motors’ businesses in Latin America, Europe and the Middle East, and Asia and the Pacific. Of GM’s profitable ventures in China, specifically, he stated that they were “a critical part of the New GM”. In response to questions of whether the New GM would import cars from China to the U.S., he stated the formative company’s core principle that “We build where we sell” applied in both directions, with GM building in China to sell in China and building in the U.S. to sell in the U.S., stating that this shortened supply chains.

    He declined to predict when the New GM would return to profitability, stating that the goal was rather to lower the break-even EBIT point for the company. He also declined to speculate upon when the U.S. government would sell its stake in the company, saying that that was a question “better addressed to the U.S. Treasury”, and merely saying that he expected it to be “years, not months” when the U.S. Treasury felt it would give “the right return for taxpayers.”

    Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=CEO_of_GM_outlines_plan_for_%22New_GM%22_after_auto_company_declared_bankruptcy&oldid=4455649”
    ">Digg
  • CEO of GM outlines plan for “New GM” after auto company declared bankruptcy">Del.icio.us
  • CEO of GM outlines plan for “New GM” after auto company declared bankruptcy">StumbleUpon
  • CEO of GM outlines plan for “New GM” after auto company declared bankruptcy">Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Read User's Comments(0)

    Irs Back Tax Prevention Suggestions For Senior Citizens

    Posted in Seniors | August 5th, 2020

    Click Here For More Specific Information On:

    Submitted by: Kaitlin Ertha

    Make Perform Spend Credit Although the “making operate spend” credit proposes it will reduce taxes for 95% of households, there is an intriguing loophole for senior citizens, which is causing some to stop up with unforeseen again tax liabilities. In accordance to the law, non-functioning senior citizens-in addition to retired railroad personnel and disabled veterans-can not claim the full credit. The difficulty is that the credit automatically adds six.twenty five% of earned revenue to taxpayer’s paychecks. Consequently, if you are a senior citizen who does not qualify for the full credit, then you will require to make certain to adjust your withholdings to avert owing a tax debt at the stop of the 12 months.Taxes on Social Protection cash flow The IRS has specific suggestions to comply with when deciding regardless of whether you social security payments are taxable. Accidentally overpaying is okay, but if you make the mistake not to spend taxes on your social protection advantages, then it could lead to IRS underpayment fines. These added penalties, on top of the by now owed taxes, can be difficult for struggling seniors to pay appear tax time. Next time you obtain a verify from Social Security, be sure to verify the gain statement to see if you are obtaining any taxes withheld. If you did not have any taxes withheld on social security and you have other resources of cash flow, you may possibly be generating for oneself an underwithholding dilemma arrive next tax time. To make certain that you are not developing an underwithholding dilemma, you ought to seek the advice of a tax professional. The tax specialist can critique your financial circumstance to establish no matter whether you want to up your withholding to cover your expected tax liability.Pension When receiving pensions, you may have a difficult time deciding how much to withhold, or if you want or need to have to withhold something at all. Whether or not you ought to have taxeswithheld from your pension payments depends on your filing status, amount of dependents, individual exemptions, additional sources of revenue, and the quantity of retirement payments you receive. If you do want to pay out taxes, you need to figure how a lot to withhold. Withholding too significantly is not a good concept as you might finish up providing the IRS an curiosity no cost loan. Nevertheless, not withholding adequate can consequence in tough-to-estimate taxes at the finish of the yr, which could lead to again taxes, penalties, and curiosity if you are not mindful.Be Aware of Deductions &amp Credits When planning your income tax return, it is essential that you take benefit all qualified deductions and credits because they will aid to reduced your complete tax liability. Don’t forget, the IRS has set up a quantity of deductions and credits immediately focusing on senior citizen taxpayers. To learn much more about tax ideas for seniors, check out out this write-up onthe RDTC.com weblog.Early Distributions If you are beneath sixty many years previous and need to have to get an early distribution from a retirement account, then be forewarned that you will probably have to spend an extra ten% tax on the money withdrawn. Even so, the tax does not apply to money from Roth IRAs, and there are different other exceptions to the tax. To find out much more, examine out the IRS’ list of the top rated 10 specifics about taking early distributions from retirement options.Accurate Tax Info The very best way to avoid unnecessary tax debts before they happen is to have your returns accurately ready by a skilled skilled. There are numerous community company applications devoted to assisting senior citizens with tax preparation, and the IRS has also set up a free of charge tax-counseling program to provide financial and tax preparing guidance to seniors all year prolonged.

    YouTube Preview Image

    About the Author: irs back taxes settlement

    arkhamcity.org/?p=2907

    Source:

    isnare.com

    Permanent Link:

    isnare.com/?aid=842171&ca=Business

    Read User's Comments(0)

    Category:Featured article

    ">
    Category:Featured article
    Posted in Uncategorized | August 5th, 2020
    Shortcut:WN:FA

    Featured articles are selected by the community to represent the best of Wikinews. See the Featured Article Candidates page for nominations and discussions of candidate articles for this page. Or, subscribe to the RSS feed!

    [edit]

    Pages in category “Featured article”

    ">Digg
  • Category:Featured article">Del.icio.us
  • Category:Featured article">StumbleUpon
  • Category:Featured article">Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Read User's Comments(0)

    A Summary Of Recent Appellate Decisions &Amp; Rules Changes

    Posted in Workplace Policy | August 3rd, 2020

    Click Here For More Specific Information On:

    Submitted by: Daniel Siegel

    Pennsylvania State Court Decisions

    1.0Civil Litigation & Procedure

    1.1Arbitration/Jurisdictional Limits

    *Superior Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Robert Half International, Inc. v. Marlton Technologies, Inc.

    2006 PA Super 145 (June 20, 2006)

    Holding:Because the monetary limits for compulsory arbitration are jurisdictional, when a defendant files a counterclaim seeking an amount in excess of the jurisdictional limits for compulsory arbitration, the arbitration program is immediately divested of jurisdiction in the matter. This is an en banc decision of the Superior Court.

    1.2Causes of Action Asbestos-Related Diseases

    *Superior Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Estate of Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp..

    2006 PA Super 136 (June 9, 2006)

    Holding:Affirming its prior en banc decision adopting the two disease rule in Marinari v. Asbestos Crop., Ltd., 612 A.2d 1021 (Pa.Super 1992), the Court holds that the diagnosis of lung cancer, even if it occurs years after a diagnosis of nonmalignant asbestos disease, triggers the running of the two year statute of limitations in asbestos cases. The two disease rule applies even if one or more of the defendants named in the second action was not named as defendant in the first action.

    1.3Causes of Action Claims Against Municipalities

    *Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Warner v. Lawrence.

    No. 1929 C.D. 2005 (June 2, 2006)

    Holding:A charter school formed under the Charter School Law, 24 P.S. 17-1701-A 17-1751-A is entitled to the same immunity as political subdivisions and local agencies receive under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, 42 Pa.C.S. 8541-8542.

    *Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Murphy v. City of Duquesne.

    No. 2284 C.D. 2005 (May 5, 2006)

    Holding:There is no cause of action against a municipality and its individual police officers for failing to investigate and prosecute criminal activity with the degree of zeal satisfactory to the plaintiff.

    1.4Causes of Action Slip & Fall Claims/Hills & Ridges

    *Superior Court of Pennsylvania

    YouTube Preview Image

    ?Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd.

    2006 PA Super 130 (June 2, 2006)

    Holding:When the condition of land is influenced by human intervention, e.g., the plowing of snow, a defendant is not insulated from liability pursuant to the hills and ridges doctrine.

    1.5Delay Damages

    *Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Touloumes v. E.S.C. Inc.

    No. 33 MAP 2004 (June 19, 2006)

    Holding:Pa.R.Civ.P. 238 does not authorize an award of delay damages in breach of contract actions involving damage to property.

    1.6Disqualification of Counsel/Appealability of Orders

    *Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Vaccone v. Syken

    No. 30 EAP 2005 (June 19, 2006)

    Holding:An Order disqualifying trial counsel in a civil case is an interlocutory order, which is not subject to immediate appeal.

    1.7Medical Malpractice

    *Superior Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Vogelsberger v. Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC Health System

    2006 PA Super 146 (June 21, 2006)

    Holdings:(1) Pa.R.Civ.P. 1042.72 does not prohibit a plaintiff from taking an immediate appeal from an order granting a new trial on non-economic damages following plaintiff s rejection of remittitur. Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 311(6), once an order for a new trial is entered under these circumstances, the plaintiff may take an immediate appeal from the order granting a new trial.

    (2) Pursuant to the MCARE Act, 40 P.S. 1303.515, and Pa.R.Civ.P. 1042.72, a trial court may grant remittitur when the damage award is excessive because it deviates substantially from what could be reasonable compensation. The standard for remittitur in medical malpractice actions differs, however, from the traditional remittitur standard, which requires a verdict to be so excessive as to offend the conscience and judgment of the Court before a Court may grant remittitur.

    ?Forrester v. Hanson

    2006 PA Super 137 (June 9, 2006)

    Holding:Pa.R.Civ.P. 1006(a.1), which requires that medical malpractice actions be filed only in a county in which the cause of action arose, does not apply to cases in which a medical malpractice claim was not filed in the original Complaint, but arises solely from a Joinder Complaint. Consequently, an order transferring the case to county where the malpractice allegedly occurred, as pleaded in the Joinder Complaint, should be reversed.

    1.8Motor Vehicle Claims

    *Superior Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Bennett v. Mucci

    2006 PA Super 133 (June 6, 2006)

    Holding:The limited tort threshold applies when the insured is injured in an accident while in the vehicle for which he or she procured limited tort coverage even if, at the time of the accident, the insured was operating the vehicle for commercial purposes and not as a private passenger motor vehicle

    .

    1.9Procedural Issues

    1.91Sanctions/Non Pros

    ?Sahutsky v. Mychak, Geckle & Welker, P.C.

    2006 PA Super 110 (May 12, 2006)

    Holding:The entry of a judgment of non pros is an appropriate sanction when counsel fails to respond to discovery requests, letters from opposing counsel relating to discovery, a motion to compel discovery, a Rule Returnable issued by the trial and an Order of the trial court compelling answers to discovery.

    1.10Spoliation of Evidence

    *Superior Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Creazzo v. Medtronic, Inc.

    2006 PA Super 152 (June 27, 2006)

    Holding:Dismissal of the Complaint is appropriate in a products liability action in which plaintiff bears the responsibility for preservation of the product.

    2Workers Compensation

    2.1Course of Employment/Home Office

    *Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Alston)

    No. 1804 C.D. 2005 (May 31, 2006)

    Holding:A claimant is entitled to compensation for an injury that occurs when the claimant is working for her employer at her home, where she regularly worked two days per week while away from the employer s official place of business. In this circumstance, claimant is furthering the business of the employer.

    2.2Limitations on Claims

    *Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Romaine v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Bryn Mawr Chateau Nursing Home)

    No. 62 EAP 2004 (June 22, 2006)

    Holding:When calculating the three (3) year statute of limitations under 413(a) of the Act, 77 P.S. 771-772, which applies to reinstatement and other petitions (See, e.g., Penn Beverage, below), the only date of import is the date on which the last payment check is received. That date constitutes the last payment of compensation provided the check is honored and payment relates back to the date of its receipt.

    *Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Penn Beverage Distributing Co. v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Rebich)

    No. 1698 C.D. 2004 (June 27, 2006)

    Holding:The three (3) year statute of limitations under 413(a) of the Act, 77 P.S. 771-772, applies to claims seeking to add a permanent scar to a Notice of Compensation Payment or an otherwise previously accepted work injury. Consequently, a claim petition seeking disfigurement benefits must be filed with three years after the date of the most recent payment of compensation. This decision also applies to petitions seeking to add a new injury arising as a direct result of an injury for which an employer has assumed liability.

    2.3Mental/Mental Injury Claims

    *Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

    ?Kennelty v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Schwan s Home Service, Inc.)

    No. 2357 C.D. 2005 (May 31, 2006)

    Holding:A claimant who suffers psychological injuries as the result of being robbed at gunpoint on multiple occasions while in the course of delivering food and collecting payments from customers is entitled to compensation for those injuries, which constitute legally sufficient abnormal working conditions. In the Opinion, President Judge Colins states that this Court is unprepared to accept that our society has deteriorated to the point where a holdup at gunpoint does not constitute an abnormal working condition for a food delivery person.

    Revised Pa. Rule of Civil Procedure 1311.1

    Effective July 1, 2006, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has increased to $25,000.00 (from $15,000.00) the maximum amount of damages recoverable in the trial of an appeal from the Award of Arbitrators in the event the plaintiff files the requisite Stipulation to Limitation of Monetary Recovery at least thirty (30) days from the date the appeal is first listed for trial.

    An Interesting Ethics Opinion

    In Formal Opinion 06-439, Lawyer s Obligation of Truthfulness When Representing a Client in Negotiation: Application to Caucused Mediation, the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has concluded that, under Model Rule 4.1, in the context of a negotiation, including a caucused mediation, a lawyer representing a party may not make a false statement of material fact to a third person. However, statements regarding a party s negotiating goals or its willingness to compromise, as well as statements that can fairly be characterized as negotiation puffing, are ordinarily not considered false statements of material fact within the meaning of the Model Rules.

    About the Author: Daniel J. Siegel, a Havertown, Pa. attorney, founded

    Integrated Technology Services

    . To subscribe or contact Dan Siegel go to

    Daniel J. Siegel.com

    or email

    Subscribe

    .

    Source:

    isnare.com

    Permanent Link:

    isnare.com/?aid=65085&ca=Legal

    Read User's Comments(0)

    Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman to quit

    ">
    Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman to quit
    Posted in Uncategorized | August 3rd, 2020

    Friday, May 2, 2014

    The presenter of BBC’s Newsnight show, Jeremy Paxman, said on Wednesday he is to leave after 25 years. The BBC said Paxman had postponed his departure, after deciding upon it last summer, because Newsnight was going through “a difficult period”.

    Paxman became a notorious political interviewer after tearing a great number of political leaders apart: In an interview with Michael Howard regarding the 1995 dismissal of the director of the prison service, Derek Lewis, when Howard didn’t directly answer a question, Paxman asked again — eleven more times. In an interview with Tony Blair, he asked Blair whether he prayed with US president George W. Bush. More recently, when Conservative MP and junior minister Chloe Smith appeared on the show to defend a change in fuel duty policy, Paxman showed she was apparently too too junior to have any knowledge of the decision making process.

    Paxman is not leaving his twenty-year role as presenter of University Challenge.

    ">Digg
  • Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman to quit">Del.icio.us
  • Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman to quit">StumbleUpon
  • Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman to quit">Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Read User's Comments(0)

    Ontario Votes 2007: Interview with Green candidate Marion Schaffer, Oakville

    ">
    Ontario Votes 2007: Interview with Green candidate Marion Schaffer, Oakville
    Posted in Uncategorized | August 3rd, 2020

    Monday, September 24, 2007

    Marion Schaffer is running for the Green Party of Ontario in the Ontario provincial election, in the Oakville riding. Wikinews’ Nick Moreau interviewed her regarding her values, her experience, and her campaign.

    Stay tuned for further interviews; every candidate from every party is eligible, and will be contacted. Expect interviews from Liberals, Progressive Conservatives, New Democratic Party members, Ontario Greens, as well as members from the Family Coalition, Freedom, Communist, Libertarian, and Confederation of Regions parties, as well as independents.

    ">Digg
  • Ontario Votes 2007: Interview with Green candidate Marion Schaffer, Oakville">Del.icio.us
  • Ontario Votes 2007: Interview with Green candidate Marion Schaffer, Oakville">StumbleUpon
  • Ontario Votes 2007: Interview with Green candidate Marion Schaffer, Oakville">Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Read User's Comments(0)

    On the campaign trail in the USA, June 2020

    ">
    On the campaign trail in the USA, June 2020
    Posted in Uncategorized | August 3rd, 2020

    Saturday, July 25, 2020

    The following is the second edition of a monthly series chronicling the 2020 United States presidential election. It features original material compiled throughout the previous month after an overview of the month’s biggest stories.

    This month’s spotlight on the campaign trail includes interviews with the vice presidential nominees of the Prohibition Party, Reform Party, and the Life and Liberty Party.

    ">Digg
  • On the campaign trail in the USA, June 2020">Del.icio.us
  • On the campaign trail in the USA, June 2020">StumbleUpon
  • On the campaign trail in the USA, June 2020">Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Read User's Comments(0)
    « Older Entries